Sunday, Feb 9th — Late
Bye Week:
49ers
Bears
Bengals
Bills
Broncos
Browns
Buccaneers
Cardinals
Chargers
Colts
Commanders
Cowboys
Dolphins
Falcons
Giants
Jaguars
Jets
Lions
Packers
Panthers
Patriots
Raiders
Rams
Ravens
Saints
Seahawks
Steelers
Texans
Titans
Vikings

The Scroll Week 18

JUMP TO

    THE SCROLL


    The DFS Slate

    (In One Central Space)


    Meet The Team


    Angles

    Angles hits inboxes on Thursday mornings throughout the regular season; you can also find Angles in The Scroll on Thursday afternoons.

    OWS Fam!!!

    Best Ball? Over. Season-long? Over. 

    Playoff spots? (Mostly) Determined. Motivation levels? Established. 

    Welcome to Week 18.

    As fast as this season has flown by us, it’s felt similarly slow, if that makes sense. The NFL is a story full of one-week seasons, each week creates such detailed assessments and seemingly requires our undivided attention in order for us to really know what’s going on. When you get into the flow of the season, that’s when the time passes us by; but as we reset each week and assess each slate, finding the energy to do this is where the season slows down.

    We’re still adjusting to what Week 18 should feel like, in my opinion. This is just the fourth full season of 17 games, and with how the schedule is laid out, the Week 18 ahead of us doesn’t seem to have the glitz or glamour the NFL hoped it would. But that doesn’t mean it’s not fun…

    The (Un)Stackables

    We’re greeted with a 13-game slate on DK this week and a 14-gamer on FD. It’s as if the NFL is saying, now that season-long fantasy football is over, we’re done catering to our biggest audience. The reality, however, is that the schedule is condensed in order to align teams to play with incentive at the same time, and also to not give much of an unfair rest advantage to next week’s playoff teams. Either way, I’m here to help break this down. 

    Want to know the most refreshing statement of the year (in an Angles Email context)? Implied totals barely matter this week. I say barely because the barometer for how much teams should score is lower this week. What I mean by that is I may dip below 20 for some stacks this week, whereas over the course of this season there were just a few occasions where a team was implied under 20 and put up a GPP-winning total (Commanders in Week 3, Giants in Week 17). It happens, but it’s rare.

    For Week 18, the only way to navigate is to more or less eliminate some teams from your player pool. What they have to play for aside, I’m cutting out the following teams from stacks: Chiefs, Patriots, Giants, Saints, Bears, Raiders, and Rams. Extremely thin margins of error for anyone stacking these teams, it can happen, of course, but it’s a razor-thin line. Beyond those seven teams, I will say that implied points don’t matter for nearly any other team. If you’re sniffing 19 points this week, you can go off, kings.

    What we have to do here, however, is help navigate where, when, and how. To do this, let’s lay out the following games as either stackable (both sides in play) or unstackable in line with expected environments, motivation, player value, etc.

    Stackable (6)

    Panthers // Falcons: Carolina seems to be over the hump with their best efforts when they couldn’t finish the job to get wins vs. the Chiefs, Eagles, and Bucs. However, Dave Canales and Bryce Young should be able to find something here in the last game of the season. The offense did not look the same without Chuba Hubbard, but a pass-heavy game plan against a team that can’t bring pressure? On the Atlanta side, a massive implied total and a matchup the Bucs just dominated last week. There should be two outcomes in this game, an Atlanta blowout win or a high-scoring, close game.

    Commanders // Cowboys: Washington has proved it can play chaotic games with the best of ‘em and this Dallas team shouldn’t offer much resistance. These two teams played an ugly first matchup that took off in the second half (54 second-half points combined), but that included CeeDee Lamb. Without his talent, the Cowboys looked one-dimensional in Philadelphia last week and the scoreboard reflected it. This isn’t my favorite of the bunch since we don’t know how much Washington will play their guys, but there’s a path to glory somewhere in here.

    Jaguars // Colts: AFC South losers can take this game in many different directions. We don’t yet know if we’ll get Richardson or Flacco against Mac Jones, but if it’s Joe Cool, the beatable Jacksonville secondary should be in for a day. The Jags’ offense should feature Brian Thomas Jr., and if not for a maddening timeshare between Tank Bigsby and Travis Etienne, we could target a back as well. An overstack here seems farther-fetched, but the key pieces on both sides are affordable and usage should be predictable from two teams already eliminated from playoff contention.

    Texans // Titans: The Texans may be nearing the completion of perhaps the quietest dominant division championship we’ve ever seen. We’re all still waiting for this offense to regain its 2023 form, but now without Stefon Diggs and Tank Dell, it seems unlikely. Or so we’re supposed to think… Houston badly needs to get its offensive mojo back before the playoffs, otherwise it’s going to be a meek first-round exit next week. The Titans could be what the doctor ordered, as there’s really no reason for Tennessee to try to win this game. We’ve seen Mason Rudolph lock onto Calvin Ridley and Chig Okonkwo lately, and it should be Tony Pollard’s backfield this week. 

    49ers // Cardinals: Do either of these teams have pride? Our guts would say yes for the 49ers but no for the Cardinals. Arizona is just 1-5 in its last six, and the Niners 1-6 in their last seven. Despite elimination, it feels like both of these teams and head coaches, in particular, are starving for a win. Josh Dobbs will likely start for Brock Purdy, which changes things a bit, but the talent is still there in San Francisco, and Arizona can match up well. Another game in a dome in January should help the scoring output.

    Dolphins // Jets: In what should be Aaron Rodgers’ final call, Snoop Huntley may be on the other side starting for a Miami team with a slim chance left to make the postseason. There’s not much to be said here except that Rodgers and Adams have proven they’ll chase stats and Huntley has at least kept the Dolphins somewhat in play. We don’t really know what happened to De’Von Achane last week, but this is a great bounce-back spot for him.

    Offenses needing attention (3): Broncos, Tampa Bay, Green Bay. Denver and Tampa do have to win their games, and we shouldn’t take that lightly. Green Bay sort of has something to play for with the possibility of climbing one seed from seventh to sixth in the NFC. Denver is hosting the Mahomes-less Chiefs, who should not be trying much this week, while Tampa has the Saints, who could be feisty if Derek Carr and/or Alvin Kamara returns, but both seem unlikely to play. Any of these three offenses could lead the slate in scoring and it would not be surprising.

    Beyond the stackables, plus the other three, there’s not a ton to like. I didn’t mention Seattle, which is eliminated but likely won’t play like it. They’re traveling to the Rams, who have clinched the division and will be resting key starters, including Matthew Stafford, so it’s hard to see this game taking flight. The Chargers are in a similar boat, therefore leaving them mostly off the table.

    Week 18 comes with plenty of unknown. Plenty of backup quarterbacks and plenty of intrigue, if you ask me. What I’ve learned is that it won’t make the most sense to lean into extremely uncomfortable, illogical spots. It will make sense to limit your player pools and lean into the teams likely to play their guys 100% of the game, just in a slightly different way. We don’t need to tell the story of Carson Wentz driving Kansas City to 30 points this week. Could it happen? Sure, but will it happen? Unlikely. Feel free to eliminate teams, players, and more from your analysis. You won’t cover every scenario and you’ll be overwhelmed in trying to do so.

    Find your paths, build your edges, and give Week 18 a chance. I’ll be mixing it up here as well in the first main slate of 2025. I hope you will too and can’t wait to see your entries taking down tournaments come Sunday!

    Thanks for reading this season!

    ~Larejo

    Week 18 Team-By-Team Motivation

    To end the season, below is a breakdown of this week’s games and team situations to help you keep the chaos of Week 18 straight if you are doing any betting, DFS, or fantasy football. Enjoy, good luck, and thank you for being a part of our community!!

    Browns @ Ravens, 4:30 pm ET, Saturday 1/4

    • Browns: Cleveland has been eliminated from the playoffs and would hold the No. 3 pick in the NFL Draft if the season ended today.
    • Ravens: Baltimore clinches the AFC North with a victory. If the Ravens win, they will be the No. 3 seed in the AFC, and if they lose, they will be the No. 5 seed.

    Bengals @ Steelers, 8:00 pm ET, Saturday 1/4

    << Add Access >>

    OWS FREE

    (No Credit card Required)

    The Workbook

    Majesstik is one of the most respected Slate Breakdown artists in DFS

    Pro Tip: For optimal viewing, use the “download” button

    Learn how to Use The Workbook

    End Around

    Hilow is a game theory expert (courses at Harvard, Yale, Stanford, and Northwestern) and tournament champion who focuses on mid/high-stakes single-entry/three-entry max

    MACRO SLATE VIEW::

    Week 18 slates typically carry more uncertainty than a standard slate, and this one takes the cake for the most uncertainty that I can remember. And yet, chalk is going to form, like any other slate. Except on this slate, the chalk is borderline ridiculous. We’ve seen this recent trend of overemphasis on projections really take hold towards the end of the regular season, something that has made the chalk even more chalky. The final primary point of emphasis on this slate is the idea that the field is highly likely to avoid variance, something we can use to our advantage as we piece together rosters this weekend. I love this slate (and I think you might, too)!

    RESTRICTIVE CHALK VS EXPANSIVE CHALK::

    Quick explanation :: Restrictive chalk is an expected highly owned piece that restricts the maneuverability of the remainder of your roster while expansive chalk is an expected highly owned piece that allows for higher amounts of maneuverability on the remainder of your roster. Classifying various forms of chalk as either restrictive or expansive allows us to visualize what it means for roster construction on a given slate and how restrictive a certain player might be – meaning more of the field will look similar from a roster construction standpoint with that piece.

    MICHAEL CARTER

    EXPANSIVE CHALK. Michael Carter saw 15 running back opportunities on a 72% snap rate in Week 17 following the injury to James Conner. The matchup is poor on paper, there are uncertainties regarding the involvement of DeeJay Dallas and potentially Tony Jones, and the Cardinals are implied for a middling 23.5 points. I am more than happy looking elsewhere.

    BUCKY IRVING

    RESTRICTIVE CHALK. Home favorite lead back on the team with the second highest Vegas implied team total. Checks out.

    BIJAN ROBINSON

    RESTRICTIVE CHALK. Home favorite lead back on the team with the highest Vegas implied team total. Checks out.

    BROCK BOWERS

    NEITHER RESTRICTIVE NOR EXPANSIVE CHALK. Brock Bowers has been able to overcome the mediocrity of his offense on his way to NFL records this season. That said, the Raiders are one of only two teams that have failed to score more than 26 points in every game this season. Even so, Bowers is one of only two or three tight ends that can put the slate out of reach this week. He’s fine.

    MIKE EVANS

    RESTRICTIVE CHALK. We’ve been playing Mike Evans all season at sub-5% ownership and he is now expected to garner 30-35% ownership. I get the feeling the field is vastly overreacting to the “incentive narrative” at play this week.

    JAUAN JENNINGS

    EXPANSIVE CHALK. Jennings will be catching passes from former college teammate Joshua Dobbs in Week 18 after being the target on three of four pass attempts from Dobbs at the end of the game last week.

    DRAKE LONDON

    NEITHER RESTRICTIVE NOR EXPANSIVE CHALK. Yes, Drake London’s aDOT has increased with Michael Penix under center for the Falcons, but this is still a team that would prefer to approach games with a run-balanced offense, in a spot they should control throughout.

    TREY MCBRIDE

    NEITHER RESTRICTIVE NOR EXPANSIVE CHALK. Sure. Hey, at least he scored through the air last week!

    JAKOBI MEYERS

    EXPANSIVE CHALK. Meyers has gone over 20 fantasy points just three times this season, with a season-high of 25.1. There are better spots for upside on this slate.

    JAXON SMITH-NJIGBA

    NEITHER RESTRICTIVE NOR EXPANSIVE CHALK. JSN hit a 4x salary multiplier his Week 18 salary four times while seeing double-digit targets six times this season. He’s fine.

    WILL SHIPLEY

    EXPANSIVE CHALK. The Eagles have some of the greatest uncertainty of any team on the slate. That does not seem like a winning equation considering the heavy expected ownership on Shipley.

    TONY POLLARD

    NEITHER RESTRICTIVE NOR EXPANSIVE CHALK. Tony Pollard has gotten in three practices, total, in the last six weeks, managing a single limited session on Friday in preparation for Week 18. I don’t know about you, but that does not inspire confidence in my head.

    CHALK BUILD::

    << 90% OFF!!! >>

    Don’t play DFS without it!

    Use code OWS90

    JM’s Player Grid

    JMToWin is a high-stakes tournament champion (Thunderdome, Luxury Box, Game Changer, Wildcat, King of the Hill/Beach, Spy, etc.) who focuses on the DraftKings Main Slate


    OWS Fam ::

    This is not a complete list of all the good plays on the slate

    This is, instead, a look at the player pool I’ll be fishing


    The Grid ::

    Bottom-Up Build

    :: covered in-depth in the Angles Pod (it’s highly recommended that you listen to the breakdown of the roster in order to see the thinking behind it, and in order to understand what we’re talking about when we look at a “bottom-up build”)

    Blue Chips

    :: my “Tier 1” plays: the plays I feel confident leaning into across different types of builds; these players have a high ceiling and a low likelihood of price-considered failure

    Build-Arounds

    :: games, offenses, situations, or scenarios I’ll be looking to build around across my rosters

    Building Blocks

    :: unique player pairings that can be used as foundational building blocks for tournament rosters

    Bonuses

    :: players who don’t fit into the categories above — either Upside pieces who don’t have the floor to be Blue Chips (and are not being focused on within my game-focused builds) or players who may not have a strong shot at ceiling, but are worth keeping in mind from a “role” perspective

    Beta

    :: a new category for 2024! — these are players who are not going to be “featured” on my tighter builds (i.e., one could show up on a tighter build, but they are not being prioritized as such), but who I will be mixing and matching across some portion of my MME builds


    Sunday Morning Update

    << 90% OFF!!! >>

    Don’t play DFS without it!

    Use code OWS90

    Bottom-Up Build

    Full breakdown (of what this is, and what the thinking is behind these players) can (and should) be found in the Angles Pod (on the One Week Season podcast feed).

    Bottom-Up Build
    DK Salary Remaining :: $6.0K

    Joe Flacco
    Michael Carter
    Isaac Guerendo
    Josh Downs
    Michael Pittman
    Brian Thomas Jr.
    Tucker Kraft
    Diontae Johnson
    Texans

    Join The Bottom-Up Build Contest On DraftKings!

    Buy-In:

    Free

    Rules:

    Build with a salary cap of $44k or below!

    Prizes:

    1st Place = 150 Edge Points + Rare Blue Name Tag in Discord
    2nd Place = 75 Edge Points
    3rd Place = 40 Edge Points

    *1 Edge Point = $1 in DFS courses on OWS

    << Join Here >>

    *must use an OWS avatar (found on your profile page) to be eligible to win

    Blue Chips

    None

    I’m not seeing any clear Blue Chips this week.

    “Light Blue” Chips

    << 90% OFF!!! >>

    Don’t play DFS without it!

    Use code OWS90

    Build-Arounds

    << 90% OFF!!! >>

    Don’t play DFS without it!

    Use code OWS90

    Building Blocks

    “Hunting Upside”
    Tyler Huntley + Tyreek Hill + Jonnu Smith + Davante Adams

    Can replace either of Tyreek/Jonnu with Achane and/or Waddle (if he plays) || can replace Davante with Breece or Garrett Wilson

    Story:

    “With explosive pieces, this game takes off”

    Why It Works:

    From my DFS Interpretations for this game ::

    • This does not feel, to me, like the game for one-offs. Davante Adams and Breece Hall can absolutely be used in that capacity, and you could make a case for Dolphins pass catchers and De’Von Achane (though that’s not how I would lean), but the quarterbacks in this game are cheap, and this game features Tyreek Hill and Jonnu Smith and De’Von Achane and potentially Jaylen Waddle, and a mobile quarterback, and Aaron Rodgers in what he knows might be the last game of his career, and Davante Adams, and Garrett Wilson, and Breece Hall, and a talented but bad Jets defense, and a good but not guaranteed-shutdown Miami defense, and taking all of that into consideration, it just feels like the most money, over time, by far, would be made by betting on this game becoming one of the stories of Week 18.
    • To be clear, we have seen enough of Tyler Huntley to know that last week’s DFS output and real-life performance are not part of his median outcomes. But we also know Mike McDaniel to be a creative problem-solver, and it’s not unusual for a toolsy backup to put together a hot streak, which is what we would be banking on here. In a game the Dolphins need to win in order to have a shot at making the playoffs, some creatively-schemed or just plain explosive big plays could set off a chain reaction of inspired aggressiveness from Rodgers and each team trading blows in a pretty high-scoring game, with excellent players not drawing particularly high ownership and looking completely obvious in retrospect.
    • I really don’t have much more to add on this one. You take a swing on this one and hope for it to play out the right way. Huntley would be a probable driver of that type of game, and if you’re really wanting to swing for the high-end outcome, your Huntley should have at least two other Dolphins (even with Huntley being a mobile QB). Huntley plus any two of Achane // Tyreek // Waddle // Jonnu works, with single- or double-Jets-bring-backs viable. We play out this slate a hundred times, and this one misses plenty; but it can definitely hit at a higher rate than it will be owned, making it strongly +EV.
    How It Works:

    If this game plays to the upside, firstly, you’ll be separating quite a bit from the field, and secondly, you’ll have four or possibly even five spots on your roster already spoken for. As such, you don’t need to worry about “being different” away from this block. Rosters with this block can look to close out final pieces in any manner desired.

    POTENTIAL DOWNSIDE:

    The story plays out differently, and you don’t get first place — which is really all that matters.

    “Things Get Weird”

    << 90% OFF!!! >>

    Don’t play DFS without it!

    Use code OWS90

    Bink Machine

    My Bink Machine creativity has dried up deep into the season. I’m not seeing any unique rules that are catching my eye this week; but same as last week, I’ll let you know in my Sunday Morning Update if this changes deeper in the weekend.

    Bonuses

    << 90% OFF!!! >>

    Don’t play DFS without it!

    Use code OWS90

    If Building For Single-Entry // Three-Entry Max

    This is my narrowest pool, which means it’s the pool likeliest to change a bit as I move deeper into builds. If it changes throughout Saturday night, I’ll add an update in this space.

    If I were building for single-entry // three-entry Max, my tightened-up player pool would be:

    QB ::

    Baker Mayfield || Joe Flacco || >><< || Geno Smith || Tyler Huntley || Bryce Young

    RB ::

    << 90% OFF!!! >>

    Don’t play DFS without it!

    Use code OWS90

    A Wrap ::

    I’ll see you at the top of the leaderboards this weekend!

    -JM

    Mike’s Player Grid

    Mike Johnson (MJohnson86) has racked up nearly $500,000 in DFS profit as an NFL tournament player with success in all styles of contests


    Welcome back to my (Mjohnson86) Player Grid. I am changing up the format of my Player Grid this year to be more direct about the players I like at each position and keep myself from casting too wide of a net. We have plenty of strategy talk and full game write-ups on every game here at OWS, this year I’m going to use this article to give direct answers on who I think the best tournament plays are each week. Also, note that just because a player isn’t on here doesn’t mean they are a bad play, I’m just intentionally trying to limit the players I list to about 3 QBs, 5 to 7 RBs, 6 to 8 WRs, and 2 or 3 TEs and that means that some plays don’t make the cut – we can’t play everyone. Feel free to drop me feedback in Discord or on Twitter about the new format and if you like this better or last year’s. Enjoy!!

    This is a list of players that stand out to me at each position from using my “Checking the Boxes” criteria outlined in my course you can find in our Marketplace. This list is a starting point, from which I build out lineups using game theory and roster construction concepts with the mindset being to find the best plays with big ceilings. Low ownership is a bonus, but not a must. 

    (Side note:: You’ll notice at the bottom of this article that Fanduel will have its own Player Grid this year)

    Draftkings Player Grid

    Quarterback ::
    • Joshua Dobbs – A rushing QB with an elite offensive mind and some above average weapons, all for min price.
    • Geno Smith – In a game where his opponent will likely be sitting many key players and a week where most lineups will take a “stars and scrubs” approach, Geno is in an ideal position to push you to the top of GPPs. 
    • Jayden Daniels – Washington values a win this week to lock the 6th seed up. There is plenty of value available on the slate and Daniels can put an exclamation point on his dynamic rookie season.
    • Salary Savers: Michael Penix Jr., Mac Jones, Joe Flacco, Tyler Huntley
    Running Back :: 
    • Bucky Irving – Elite matchup, surging workload, and high team total in a game that the Bucs need to win.
    • Bijan Robinson – Elite matchup, surging workload, and high team total in a game that the Falcons need to win.
    • Michael Carter – Extremely cheap and is more talented than most people likely realize. Good in the passing game and the game environment sneakily has more upside than the field will see. He is likely to be very popular so I prefer him as a part of game stacks.
    • Isaac Guerendo – Guerendo has done very well with his opportunities and should be a featured part of this week’s game plan. He also provides potential leverage off a sure-to-be chalky Joshua Dobbs, or he could be played along with Dobbs as a way to lock in all the 49ers scoring. Guerendo has pass catching chops and the pair could certainly pair up for a score in the passing game.
    • Ray Davis – The Bills will be resting key players and are OK with it if they don’t win….but the Patriots actually WANT to lose. That matters. I expect the Bills to have success. I expect the Bills to protect James Cook and Josh Allen. Davis is talented and the team hasn’t come out and said he will be featured so no one will be on him.
    • Will Shipley – Talented rookie and, similar to Davis, can benefit from his team’s winning culture helping them put a solid product on the field.
    • Zach Charbonnet – No Kenneth Walker. Facing Rams backups. The man scored 40 points just 4 weeks ago.
    Wide Receiver :: 

    << 90% OFF!!! >>

    Don’t play DFS without it!

    Use code OWS90

    Sonic’s MME Pool

    Sonic is a Milly Maker winner and large-field tournament mastermind who focuses on mass-multi-entry play

    Sonic’s MME Pool will be back in 2025

    Papy’s Pieces

    Papy is a full-time DFS player, with a focus on high-stakes tourneys, and with hundreds of thousands in lifetime profit

    The Board
    • The final week of the season has one game that reaches the top tier. CAR/ATL (48) is predicted to be high scoring, with no other games projected within four points of its total.
    • The middle tier is small and has four games. JAX/IND (44), WAS/DAL (44), NO/TB (43.5), and SF/AZ (43) all have the potential to produce good fantasy scores, but also all have issues with how motivated the participants will be throughout the game.
    • The bottom tier holds most of the slate with eight games. LV/LAC (41.5), CHI/GB (41), KC/DEN (40), MIA/NYJ (39), SEA/LAR (38.5), NYG/PHI (37), BUF/NE (36.5), and HOU/TEN (36.5). All of these games have issues ranging from injuries to team motivation.
    Pawn – RB Michael Carter ($4,700)

    Carter stepped into a lead role (72% of the snaps) in Week 17 and turned 15 opportunities into 81 total yards. With James Conner and Trey Benson both hitting the IR, there is no reason to believe Arizona will do anything other than use Carter as their every down back to close the season. The 49ers have been generous against the run (25th in DVOA) and have no reason to get up for this game. We know that Carter has always had passing game chops, and with a good chance for 2-5 targets on dump-off plays, plus a realistic shot at 20 carries, it’s impossible to ignore Carter who is still priced near the minimum. He’s not going to sneak up on anyone, but his cheap salary gives you plenty of options to get different at other positions. I’m going to take the free square on Carter.

    Knight – QB Joe Flacco ($5,400)

    << 90% OFF!!! >>

    Don’t play DFS without it!

    Use code OWS90

    The Oracle

    The Greatest “Cheat Sheet” In DFS

    Each week in The Oracle, OWS team members will take on the key strategy questions from that week’s slate :: sharing their thoughts on how they plan to approach these critical elements from a roster-construction, game theory, and leverage perspective.

    Week 18 Topics

    1. Sorting Through The Chaos

    2. False Pretenses

    3. Stack SZN

    4. Value Plays

    5. “That was so obvious, how did I not see it?”


    1. Sorting Through The Chaos

    The Question ::

    I can’t help but chuckle a bit as I look at player and ownership projections for the week on Thursday and Friday and they are all over the place and basically just hands thrown up as there are so many moving parts on all of these teams that it really is hard to know what to expect. There really is nothing like the final week of an NFL season and this year is no exception, with so many variables and situations to consider and question marks all over the place in terms of how teams will approach the week, motivations for individuals and teams, and difficulty to know where we can find “certainty”. There are even a lot of spots where the “motivations” for a particular team could be fluid and change as the game is being played – for example if the Commanders are up big on the Cowboys, then the Packers game becomes meaningless for seeding purposes and they’ll be traveling to Philly next week. In that scenario, how quickly do Jordan Love and Josh Jacobs come off the field? Similarly, on Wednesday’s Fanduel Labs show I talked about how the Bucs Defense could be correlated with Michael Penix Jr. and the Falcons passing game, as a scenario where the Bucs dominate the Saints would leave Atlanta knowing their season is over and potentially letting the rookie QB sling it. All of the “chaos” provides anxiety and stress as we search for “certainty”, but it also provides a golden opportunity for those willing to embrace it.

    What strategies do you see for your approach to this week in particular that may not work out every year but you believe, over time, give you the best chance to take advantage of the uncertainty that Week 18 provides? Also, do you have a particular type of contest that you prefer on this unique slate?

    The Answers ::
    JM >>

    As I’ve made known, of course: I don’t typically play the final week of the regular season. Part of this is schedule-related. This is typically a difficult week to get out of state to reserve DraftKings entries. Another part of this is slate-related. After wrapping my final week of content on the season (at the end of what’s effectively a six month marathon-sprint), I’m usually not enthusiastic about playing what is, in a sense, a different DFS sport than we’re playing the rest of the year (said differently: if this were a week like any other week, playing the slate would be my final reward for all the hard work of the season; but with this slate providing completely different challenges and edges to a normal slate, it feels less like a reward and more like work). I do, however, have thoughts on this slate — from years of research, prep, and “paying attention on Sunday” in the final week of the regular season — so I’ll share what I can in this regard.

    Firstly, I see the edge on this slate being greater in large-field play than in small-field play. Or, said another way: I think our typical small-field edges go away (which isn’t to say we can’t find new small-field edges on this week — but is instead to say that the edges we can typically bank on in small-field play go away), as we are generally well-positioned in small-field play through our ability to turn the math in our favor with higher-confidence plays and better roster construction. With so much chaos swirling around the final weekend of the regular season, confidence is lowered across the board, which makes it harder to stamp in the typical edge we have on tighter builds. At the same time, this opens the door for a chaos-embracing mindset to benefit us in large-field play. Asking “what if” questions, and being willing to be wrong in order to potentially be “all the way right,” can create edges that aren’t typically available. If I were playing, I would lower my bankroll exposure this week, and I would focus more heavily on large-field play. I think there is a good chance that at least one or two other OWS contributors will say that this is a week in which they typically expand their bankroll exposure, so don’t take my thoughts as instructions. You can, however, take my thoughts as one angle to consider for your own play this week.

    Secondly, I think it’s important to point out that true “out of nowhere” scores are not as common in the final week of the regular season as legend seems to have it. In order for an “out of nowhere” piece to pay off, that player has to produce a truly noteworthy (price-considered) score. They have to outscore all the popular pieces in their price range — otherwise, you’re taking on extra risk for no real reward. If you’re considering going “off the board” this week, be sure to ask yourself whether or not the play you’re considering has genuine “had to have it” potential if everything comes together.

    Xandamere >>

    I think a lot of people focus on “what if” scenarios in the final week that are all about upside. What if Josh Jacobs is pulled partway through the game and Emmanuel Wilson gets more run, for example. But as I see it, that’s the wrong way to play the final week…while it is certainly possible for some big scores to come from out of left field, if you look at the history of winning final week rosters, that’s not actually the case all that often (or, well, maybe in some VERY large field stuff). 

    What’s much more important, in my opinion, is avoiding land mines. Avoiding the spots where a team does in fact mail it in early, or avoiding the spots where the field is expressing a lot of certainty (through high ownership) in spots that are actually highly volatile (i.e. RB1 is resting, everyone jumps on RB2, but the team just uses a split backfield with multiple RBs all getting 10 touches). 

    Like every week, chalk will form this week…but the chalk is much more fragile this week than it is in most weeks. That’s not to say it can’t hit, of course, but broadly speaking final week chalk tends to have a lower chance of hitting than mid-season chalk. 

    I also think it’s even more important than normal to have your rosters tell a story. A good corollary here is think about how to draft playoff best ball rosters. Every playoff best ball roster tells a story of what teams win each round and advance, and if your story is right, you stand a better chance of winning. Week 18 rosters are kind of like that if you’re looking at teams and motivation – as Mike pointed out, for example, if the Commanders are whomping the Cowboys, the Packers game becomes meaningless to them, so Commanders pieces could potentially be correlated with someone like an Emmanuel Wilson (and definitely should not be played with Jordan Love or Josh Jacobs, IMO). On the flip side of that, if you want to play Rico Dowdle or Brandin Cooks, they correlate positively with the main Packers weapons. Make sure your rosters tell stories, and for you MME folks, make sure you’re setting up your optimizer rules to take advantage of these stories (i.e. at most 1 of Jayden Daniels and Josh Jacobs could be a rule, or another could be in any roster with Brandin Cooks, boost the projection of Jacobs and Love – that sort of thing). 

    Finally, I will note that it’s extremely common for DFS players to think core players on unmotivated teams are bad plays because they have nothing to play for. But…that’s not really how football teams operate. Generally speaking playoff-bound teams will rest key starters, but eliminated teams usually play things pretty straight up. For example, last season nobody wanted to play Breece Hall because the Jets were eliminated, and he smashed at very low ownership and won people tournaments. TL;DR here is motivation is much more important for playoff-bound teams than it is for eliminated teams. Since the result of this is that we also see extremely heavy ownership on teams with lots of motivation, there is fantastic opportunity to play into the eliminated teams.

    Hilow >>

    That’s really it, isn’t it? I think this question is framed beautifully because it captures what Week 18 truly is – a slate of uncertainty. But that also perfectly describes how to be most profitable in Week 18. The field is generally risk averse, meaning they are more comfortable with more certainty. In Week 18, we have almost zero certainty. There are a few teams with “something to play for,” there are the narratives behind incentives, and there are teams that are quite literally talking out of their collective asses. Weeding through all that to find the spots that carry legitimate upside is the name of the game, and we might have to embrace more uncertainty (read: variance) than on a typical slate. The field is not going to feel comfortable in doing that, hence the percentage solution will be to stay away from it. That provides us with an opportunity to get creative with the amount of variance we are willing to accept. Also note that the structure of this slate is such that 30+ fantasy points scores and 25+ fantasy point scores are likely to be less plentiful than on a normal slate, increasing the importance of gaining exposure to the players that do have that within their ranges of outcomes.

    The short answer is to embrace more variance than the field. The long answer is nuanced and deserves its own explanation, which you beautiful people will get on The Slate podcast!

    I think it’s fine to attack contests of all sizes this week, but I would adamantly contend that GPPs will be more profitable in the long run as compared to cash games on a slate with so much uncertainty.

    Mike >>

    I alluded to the Falcons situation in the question above, and that is one spot and example of where I think there is an advantage. Finding those second level correlations that exist this week whereas usually different games would have zero effect on each other. Not everyone is Dan Campbell and is going to go all-out regardless of situation. 

    I always play the Afternoon Only slate, as I’ve binked that a couple of times in recent years and one of those times was this exact slate on the final week of the year. This week I think that is an especially strong approach for most people as it naturally condenses your player pool. The Early Only slate is also a strong option for the same reasons, although I don’t like the contest options as much on that slate. Don’t be afraid to play those lineups built for the smaller slate on the Main Slate either, as there are enough games on each slate for a GPP winning score for the big slate to come from one of the smaller slates.

    Finally, the thing that most people focus on are “player incentives” and “team motivations” in this week. Low hanging fruit, but not how you’re going to win, in my opinion. Many of the incentive things are not in the player’s control and the opponent isn’t just going to let them hit these marks. And for every “nothing to play for” team, you also have a situation where some players are playing for their next contract and/or players and teams can look at it as “we have several months to rest after today, why hold back?” These are NFL players, they don’t walk on the field thinking about or worried they are going to suffer catastrophic injuries.


    2. False Pretenses

    The Question ::

    Building off the first question, so much of DFS is now built around projection systems and “Sims”. The issue with those on a week like this is that any kind of automated system like that is only as good as the inputs, and this week the inputs are more volatile than any other. We obviously focus on the offensive side of the ball, but there are things happening on the defensive side that will also change what many of these games look like. For example, the Chiefs defense is 9th in the NFL in DVOA (ironically, 9th against both the run and the pass). But if they are resting a bunch of starters and the players on the field are a lot of guys who didn’t help them to that 9th place ranking, then how do we handle that? The Chiefs are an easy one to point out, but there are several similar spots where a defense’s name/reputation could be pushing people away from a spot they should actively be attacking. Which, if any, spots do you see where “false pretenses” could be giving us opportunities to get ahead of the field?

    The Answers ::

    << 90% OFF!!! >>

    Don’t play DFS without it!

    Use code OWS90

    Thanks for hanging out with us in The Oracle this week

    We’ll see you at the top of the leaderboards this weekend!

    Willing To Lose

    Larejo is a mid-stakes tournament mastermind who specializes in outmaneuvering 150-max players with a small number of entries

    It’s important to note this week that I could probably pick any situation(s) and describe how and why they can hit, and it would be fitting for Week 18. When sitting to write this week, I can’t help but start with that statement. Week 18 is an all-around mess, but that’s what makes it beautiful. Wherever and however you have conviction, you should feel empowered to build around those players or situations and tell the story that works to win a large-field tournament. The spirit of Willing to Lose is exactly this – to identify the “Week 18” situations each week and lean into them to have some fun and profit. That’s where the problem lies this week, as the “Week 18” situations are the entire slate 🙂 So here we are…

    In years past, my strategy heading into this slate would be a bit thin. It’s far more exciting to identify players whom you’ve never heard of prior to this week and daydream about them having career days. Build-a-players will still seem to be all over the fields on Red Zone on Sunday, as you’ll get teams like the Eagles, Rams, Chiefs, and more resting most of their core guys. But as I’ve matured (tried to) as a DFS player, the way to play in Week 18 which will win you the most money over time is by understanding the probabilities and leaning into the likelier spots on the teams and players being overlooked. As I wrote earlier in the week, this eliminates at least six teams from my stacks list, as we still want to back the teams expected to produce offensively in their games.

    Tyler Huntley + Tyreek (or Waddle) + Jonnu + Davante

    << 90% OFF!!! >>

    Don’t play DFS without it!

    Use code OWS90

    Biases

    Prich has won over $300k the past 3 years and has found an edge in understanding the field biases and more importantly his own biases when building rosters.

    I want to begin my last article of the 2024 season by thanking RotoMaven and JM for giving me the space to write about a totally new topic in fantasy sports. I have come across plenty of people talking about bias, but rarely pausing to give it the credit it deserves. Bias is a huge detractor from optimal play and because it involves a simpler and easier form of thinking, it often helps build consensus on bad decisions. Bias can be punishing and compounding, resulting in a sort of decision making that resembles the behavior of a pendulum. The problem is, bias can be hard to recognize.

    I have played the last game of a lost season as a Senior in college. Our team came together and convinced our coach to let us run the style of offense we liked best and we dominated a highly rated team. That’s a bias I carry with me into week 18. We did it! So can another team. Maybe CLE can take down BAL. If I recognize this as bias, I can look for similar narratives that involve a final game collapse in a lost season and likely everything in between. I can find out how likely it is that a lost season spells doom for a team. Once recognized, there are ways to challenge that bias and try to make a better decision than the one the bias was leading you to.

    I often see in OWS Discord the comments about this topic. The positive comments (haven’t had any negative yet) show a genuine interest in the topic and desire to know more, but I think it is a difficult topic to act on. In order to recognize, one must slow down and that can be hard. In order to act, one must have confidence. I think I have benefited from this article, especially when I have slowed down and built lineups with confidence in my process.

    THANK YOU!

    For an incredible 2024 Season!

    Join us Through the Superbowl

    This is the first year I have ever published my DFS Interpretations on the site in a professional way. After the entire OWS team’s write-ups are posted, usually later on Friday night, I read through everything and get little shots of adrenaline and dopamine when my thoughts line up with another analyst. I want to be approved in this space and so seeming sharp is a desire of mine, but it also directs me to read and look for confirmation in my thoughts about the slate. This confirmation bias has been a strong distraction for me this year. I need to be looking for unique thoughts of mine that are going to help me be different while still making +EV lineups. I should be celebrating those places where my thoughts are unique and can set me apart from the field. Chalk isn’t bad, but I have been far too willing to roster chalky plays this year than trust those differentiators.

    Are your biases of the simple variety and therefore easier to diagnose? Do you tend to let recent performance dictate your choices? Are you swayed by one writer and the way they “frame” the information you are looking for? Are you always jumping on new situations (injury replacements) and hoping to hit a large ceiling at a cheap cost? Whatever the bias is, try to recognize it and play through it. More likely, you are prone to new biases every week, and even that realization is a great benefit. If you feel like you fall into this category of players, you probably have a lot of NFL knowledge and are looking for ways to confirm this knowledge in your roster decisions. You have probably had weeks where you didn’t quite have time to put in the same effort, especially lately, and have allowed your mind to take shortcuts. Seemingly simpler decisions are ripe with bias and we just miss it. 

    Why is bias punishing? Compounding? Simply put, the person who is prone to making decisions based on bias is not making decisions at all, and if DFS is a game of decisions, the person who is prone to bias isn’t even really playing DFS at all. How much of our competition falls under that umbrella? They are not even playing the game – they are often taking projectable median outcomes for a game and trying to roster as many median outcomes as possible in various games. Let’s make sure we are at least better at decision making than those players. A few biased decisions can lead to a roster that has no path to first but still makes you feel good for putting it together. Those are the dangerous rosters. They trick us into thinking we are good DFS players too. Be very discerning while deciding on final lineups.

    SATURDAY GAMES

    << 90% OFF!!! >>

    Don’t play DFS without it!

    Use code OWS90

    Fanduel Leverage

    Mike Johnson (MJohnson86) has racked up nearly $500,000 in DFS profit as an NFL tournament player with success in all styles of contests

    This article is specifically designed to give you some ideas on ways that we can use strategy to jump ahead of the field on Fanduel. Touchdowns play an even bigger role on Fanduel than on Draftkings because receptions are only worth half a point, while on DK receptions are worth a full point. Touchdowns used to be an even bigger deal before (this year, FD added bonuses for yardage totals – more on this below), but it’s still something we need to focus on because of the reception difference and how they price their players. Touchdowns have a high degree of variance and since they carry so much weight on Fanduel, this article will focus on ways each week that we can leverage that variance to jump ahead of the field when things don’t go exactly as expected as far as who crosses the imaginary line while holding the football.

    Week 18

    << 90% OFF!!! >>

    Don’t play DFS without it!

    Use code OWS90

    Afternoon-Only

    Mike Johnson (MJohnson86) has racked up nearly $500,000 in DFS profit as an NFL tournament player with success in all styles of contests

    Strategy Ideas and Things To Consider

    Finding An Edge

    The whole idea behind this piece of content is that it is unique. Specific content and strategies for the “non-main slate” contests are very rare in the DFS industry, and most players who enter them are casual players or doing so on a whim after their main slate entries have had things go wrong and they want something to root for or to chase their losses during the late games. Edges are getting harder and harder to find in DFS as information gets better, projections get sharper, and the field gets more experienced. These smaller slates present a clear opportunity for an advantage for those that focus on them, as most players will just take their thoughts from the main slate and approach these lineups the same way – without considering how much having seven to nine fewer games (depending on the week) changes the strategy. The biggest win of my career came on an “Afternoon Only” slate in January of 2021 and I hope to share some of my insights on the format to help you attack this niche corner of NFL DFS.

    Ownership Strategy
    • Ownership will be higher for pretty much every player on “short slates” just because there are fewer players to choose from. This will be especially true for “chalky” players from the main slate.
    • This means getting these players right is even more vital than on a main slate. There are fewer alternatives to choose from, so if they have a big game and you aren’t on them, it is much harder to find other ways to make up those points.
    • This also means it is easier for lower owned players to pay off, as there are fewer players at their position that they need to have “fail” for them to be worth the risk.
    • Correlation is even more important than on the main slate because the useful fantasy games that pay off for the slate are likely to be clumped up from the same games. I always make lineups with a game stack (QB + at least one pass catcher + at least one opponent) and then one or two “mini-correlations” from other games.

    THANK YOU!

    For an incredible 2024 Season!

    Join us Through the Superbowl
    Week 18 Overview

    And Here. We. Go.

    Week 18 Afternoon Slate, where magic happens. A lot of dynamics at play this week and a five game slate that lets us find a lot of fun ways to get unique and build optimal tournament lineups. Don’t forget that this final Afternoon slate of the season is where the biggest score of my career happened. There really are a lot of angles to consider and so much of the field misunderstands this week in general. The SF/ARI game is really intriguing to me and a game that I think could turn into a true shootout. The SEA/LAR game has a lot of paths to being more competitive than people will realize. The Dolphins are fighting for a chance at the playoffs, while Aaron Rodgers tries to end his season with at least a small amount of dignity. Brock Bowers is chasing history with the Raiders and the Chargers have been hot recently. The Broncos are playing for a chance at the playoffs and the Chiefs are rolling out their backups but are very well coached and it wouldn’t be the first time we saw a Sean Payton team choke.

    QB Strategy

    Quarterback is always an important position but that importance goes to another level on these small slates. There are two main reasons for this. First, on average, quarterbacks obviously score the most points of any position and we can only start one of them. Second, as noted above, correlation is even more important as the slates get smaller and there are fewer scoring opportunities to go around. By choosing the right quarterback, you are also increasing the chances that you are right at two other positions. Again, the shorter slate condenses the scoring across all lineups, making each position more vital to separating and giving yourself a chance to win. This is why quarterback strategy has its own section:

    << Add Access >>

    OWS FREE

    (No Credit card Required)

    UD Playoff BB

    Strategy for Underdog’s “The Gauntlet” & “The Mitten”

    (Updated 1/6/2025)

    Overview 
    • Six player snake draft comprised of 10 rounds in a Best Ball tournament format.
    • Teams are made up of 10 total players with a starting lineup of 5 players – 1 QB, 2 WR/TE, 1 RB, and 1 Flex.
    • (4) Round structure with the top two teams advancing out of a group of (6) in the first round, followed by two independent rounds with only one team advancing out of each from a group of (10). The finals are comprised of 300 teams in the Super Bowl with $200K up top.
    • Getting out of the first round is crucial, but difficult if drafting three or more players from a bye team (Kansas City Chiefs and Detroit Lions).
    • Like a Milly Maker on DK, the payout structure is extremely top heavy. 

    The final two bullets bring up an interesting dilemma as the two bye teams are the most likely to make the conference final and Super Bowl but drafting several of those players also hamper your chances of getting out of the first round. 

    To win, you will likely need (at least) five players to reach the Super Bowl. This incentivizes stacking your lineups to consolidate around a few teams you are hoping can make deep playoff runs, however, an aggressive stacking strategy has its trade-offs. If you prioritize stacking elite contenders, such as the Chiefs or Lions, this will likely have you drafting some poorly projected depth players to round out your team. Someone in your first pod/round will likely have drafted studs on wild card teams and while they will have an uphill battle to win the whole tournament, these teams will have a leg up on getting out of the first round.

    If you consider stacking both bye teams, you must cap that at a total of 5 players and are fighting an uphill battle to advance. The tournament is very top heavy, and the two one seeds are the most likely to advance, so we will discuss below some of the strategies to best balance this predicament and try to thread a very thin needle to advance a team to the final 300 teams.

    Roster Composition

    << 90% OFF!!! >>

    Don’t play DFS without it!

    Use code OWS90

    Videos and Podcasts

    SEARCHING FOR CEILING – HILOW & RICH HRIBAR

    DFS LABS FD – MIKE JOHNSON & MAXIMUS

    DFS LABS DK – HILOW & CHEESEMAN

    UD PLAYOFF BEST BALL – STATATL