JMToWin is a high-stakes tournament champion (Thunderdome, Luxury Box, Game Changer, Wildcat, King of the Hill/Beach, Spy, etc.) who focuses on the DraftKings Main Slate
JM’s journal will be live ON FRIDAY BUT AVAILABLE BEGINNING WEDNESDAY ON DISCORD FOR INNER CIRCLE MEMBERS
TUESDAY, NOV. 4 ::
INITIAL PATRIOTS-BUCS ANGLES ::
We have to assume there will be a lot of passing in ne/tb. two teams that are really difficult to run against. the bucs, in particular, are willing to just let it rip. the pats will almost certainly strive to stay balanced throughout, but we should ultimately see higher-than-normal passing volume for both teams.
INITIAL THOUGHTS ON WEEK 10 CEILING FOR WRs/RBs ::
I see more âquestion marks toward ceilingâ at high-cost rb than at high-cost wr this week, which creates a really fun/unique setup.
typically, we lock in our highest certainly at rb; but if we have question marks on ceiling at high-cost rb, and weâre trying to win tourneys, it may tilt us toward saving saleh at rb in order to maximize our chances of securing ceiling at wr.
puka in a likely competitive game
jsn likely seeing enough volume to pop
arsb vs a very soft secondary (albeit with moderate volume concerns)
egbuka in a likely high-volume passing game
nico vs a team that literally most of his biggest games in his career have come against
waddle (assuming no trade) vs buf where wr1s have feasted
and then on top of that we have davante and jj with ceiling
meanwhile, at rb, we have cmc at $9k in a poor matchup for ceiling, gibbs with a high ceiling but a low price-considered floor, james cook & derrick henry with high rushing ceilings but limited pass game involvement (leaving us with a low floor), achane with games of 26.2 and 34 this season, but with 20.1 or fewer points in every other game, and kyren at $6.6k having cracked 20.4 only once.
where are we likelier to find tourney winners?
this will be a fun little challenge to deal with this week â on a week in which our builds might end up looking a little different than normal.
INITIAL WEEK 10 PRICING THOUGHTS ::
The last few weeks, weâve regularly seen value open up deeper into the week.
it looks like pricing is a bit tight this week, so iâm not super focused on practice builds just yet. instead, iâm more focused on just continuing to open the slate and flip through matchups and see what thoughts develop.
just an angle worth highlighting: we might not need to worry too much, just yet, about how weâll fit the pieces we like. maybe the answer to that will become more clear toward the end of the week â and if itâs a week where thatâs not the caseâŚwell, those are the types of weeks where itâs typically best to not overthink your salary savers, anyway. when there is no strong value, itâs best to just pick a few pieces that have upside and let it rip.
EARLY WEEK 10 QB THOUGHTS ::
QBs i have eyes on ::
dart at chi
caleb v nyg
lamar at min
maye at tb
stafford at lar
goff at was
RISING SALARIES FOR JT, CMC AND PRODUCTION COMPARISON TO MYSTERY TWO-PLAYER BLOCK:
Weâre at the point in the season (jonathan taylor, and nearly there with CMC, puka, and jsn) where we can start to really wrap our heads around what weâre looking for from a player who costs, say, $10.2k.
think about the game logs for those guys.
for jt, the occasional score in the high teens or low 20s, and a bunch of games in the mid- to high-30s.
for cmc (removing the game v houston), 100% of games going for low-20s and higher, with only two over 30, but with both of those being difference-making games (37/42).
for puka, every healthy game but one in the 20s, with the one exception being a game of 39.0.
so. okay.
the following âgame logâ is for the last 17 games of a block of correlated players who cost $10.2k (basically jt; maybe soon to be cmc)âŚ
46.9
38.5
56.4
38.8
28.0
51.7
20.1
38.2
44.3
47.5
35.3
44.2
38.4
30.9
27.7
42.2
54.1
iâm not being withholding, but iâm not going to post the player block for like 30 minutes. the goal is that youâll go through that game log and think about what it would look like in the draftkings app if this were the end of the season, and this were the full-season game log of a $10.2k player.
how popular would this player be? (and then imagine that they were letting us cover two spots with this player, turning the math even more in our favor, and not requiring us to be salary-constricted elsewhere?)
PLAYER-BLOCK REVEAL ::
Thereâs nothing sneaky or magical about this block. itâs lamar jackson + mark andrews.
andrews has double-digit points in 12 of 17 (13.8+ in 11/17), which is outrageously consistent for a guy at $3.4k â especially as sentiment on him is low, and he never gets rostered at a high rate as a result.
furthermore, a lot of the games in which lamar has âdisappointedâ with 22/23ish, andrews has scored ~15+ to pull up this block.
and if lamar has a huge game (35+) without andrews making a huge impact (which also sometimes happens), youâre not suffering too much as there are games in which lamar just doesnât hit with anyone, so anyone stacking him is probably also playing andrews, or has a pretty good shot at spending even more salary for a disappointing score. (furthermore, the main competition for a lamar/andrews roster â if lamar hits without andrews â is lamar/zay; and as weâve explored, this one is almost never the ideal way to play this, as zay isnât used as a major red zone threat for this offense.)
if this were a wr/rb block â or something similar â i would probably play it on 100% of rosters this week.
because itâs qb/pass-catcher, itâs a bit more complicated, as you can only play one quarterback, and there are things out there like flacco/higgins last week, or bo nix hanging 40 a few weeks ago, etc.
i donât want to totally cut myself off from other options that could âwin the slate at multiple spots,â but this does also (clearly) have the ceiling to be âthat playâ if things come together.
furthermore, hitting even the typical floor of this block keeps you in contention for a solid weekend even if something else goes off. we saw that last week with a similar block in trevor lawrence // parker washington. we laid out scores for that $8.8k block late last week, comparing it to similarly-priced players. that ended up going for 39.2 last week (basically beating cmc by a couple points for the same salary spent, while making it easy to also have cmc on that roster). this was a) barely more than flacco scored on his own for $5.6k (not ideal), b) still a tremendous score for $8.8k, and c) still good enough that i was in the top 5% in tourneys on a roster that took a dud from dk metcalf and a relative dud from kareem hunt alongside this block. a long way of saying: this block isnât perfect. but itâs damn good.
Crash the leaderboards
PFP the OWS pennant
WEDNESDAY, NOV. 5 ::
NICO COLLINS THOUGHTS ::
We talked about this earlier in the season, but just to recap ::
Taking out his first two years (no games cracking 16 DK points), Nico Collins has now played 34 regular season games.
He has gone for 26+ DraftKings points eight times (which is â by the way â far lower than the hit rate the field seems to peg to him; that’s a 23.5% hit rate of keeping you on a 194-point pace, at a price tag where guys start to get far more consistent; and that’s if we just cherry-pick his last few years), and three of those games have come against Jacksonville. Furthermore, he has gone for 22.9+ in four straight against Jacksonville.
This all becomes less interesting this time around, with Davis Mills under center. But it’s at least a data point worth shouting out.
JAXON SMITH-NJIGBA VS. CARDINALS THOUGHTS ::
JSN is an interesting guy to think through this week. At $8.6k, he has not posted 4x his salary a single time this year, and he’s playing an Arizona defense that generally forces tight-window throws, and that â more importantly â is starting Jacoby Brissett against this ferocious Seattle pass rush (making it seem at least somewhat unlikely that the Seahawks are pushed in this one).
JSN has averaged 24.5 DK points per game on only 78 targets (an outrageous 2.51 DK points per target), but it’s tough to project him for more than 9-11 targets in this spot.
The ceiling is tremendous, and the floor is high enough to justify the play. But I do wonder if we’ll move deeper into the week and find that he’s maybe not at the absolute top of the list among all the intriguing wide receiver options.
PUKA VS. 49ERS THOUGHTS ::
Contrasting with JSN, Puka is averaging 2.34 DK points per target (also elite), and in a game against the 49ers (especially with some healthy bodies potentially returning for San Francisco on offense), it’s not difficult to paint a picture of Puka seeing 13-15 targets.
Both guys are tremendous plays, and it’s a bit early in the week to worry about ranking one guy higher than the other; but there does appear to be a bit of a tilt toward Puka here.
PATS VS. BUCCANEERS DEEPER DIVE ::
Probably a bit of a hot take here, but I think the Patriots are a tier better than the Bucs. While their records are similar, the Pats have been far more dominant on a down-to-down basis, and if we remove the weirdness of Week 1, their slip-ups have mostly been self-imposed (four fumbles in their 7-point loss to Pittsburgh; a late-half pick that completely shifted the flow of the game vs Atlanta). The Bucs, on the other hand, have been inconsistent on a down-to-down basis, and have pieced together a 6-2 record with late-game magic from Baker. Obviously, this game is in Tampa, which needs to be thought about // accounted for; but in terms of “how this game could play out,” I do think those factors are at least worth keeping in mind.
As for this game as a whole, I honestly wonder how much I’ll go here.
We know this is a poor spot for each run game, which we like in terms of “pass funnel spot” for each team; but things get a bit complicated after that.
On the Pats’ side, we can confidently expect a strong game from Drake Maye (with an elite game within range as an outlier outcome), and if Maye hits, we probably get one pass catcher hitting with him. But who will that “one pass catcher” be? That’s a question mark each week â and generally speaking, that “one pass catcher who hits” isn’t hitting for a big enough score to justify the guessing-game risk we take on. In large-field play, there is definitely an angle here, but I don’t currently see this shaping up as a spot I’ll get to on tighter builds.
On the Bucs’ side, we have Emeka Egbuka with ceiling, but we also have a borderline-elite defense in the Pats, with only Miami (in Miami â with Christian Gonzalez still missing in action) and Atlanta (through several superhuman catches by Drake London) cracking 21 points in this matchup. Miami scored 27. Atlanta scored 23.
If you want to paint a positive picture for Egbuka: the Falcons were able to use stacks and motion to get London onto Marcus Jones for a few big plays, and as is the case with any corner: you can’t guard a perfect throw (or a perfect catch), which allowed London to score a touchdown in coverage from Gonzalez as well. Egbuka can absolutely get there; but at his price, I do think we’re fighting a bit of an uphill battle.
The Patriots are also a game-plan defense, which will have their attention on Egbuka; but this does open an interesting question. “If we expect the Bucs to be passing, and we expect the Pats to focus their attention on Egbuka, doesn’t this open the opportunity for another pass catcher to hit at a low price tag?” Because the Pats have been so good at limiting touchdowns, we could easily come away from this game with no one on the Bucs posting high-end production; but if anyone is going to get there, a couple good options are Tez Johnson and Cade Otton. Tez is effectively the WR2 now (assuming no Chris Godwin), and his downfield chops do give him some level of ceiling. Otton, meanwhile, costs only $3.9k on DK, and has recent games of 12.1 // 10.1 // 13.5 // 8.0, all without a touchdown scored. He’s been more heavily emphasized amidst all the pass catcher injuries for the Bucs, and the Pats have been soft against tight ends all season.
QUINSHON JUDKINS THOUGHTS ::
Not much to like from the Browns // Jets game (obviously), but if we’re looking for a viable mid-range running back, Quinshon Judkins is an option. Given the structure of the Jets’ offense and how they like to attack games â where their weaknesses are; where their (relative) strengths are; etc. â it’s hard to see them having much success this week against the Browns. This should allow the Browns to focus on short-area passing, and to slam Judkins into a Jets defense now missing Quinnen Williams in the middle.
I would like Judkins quite a bit more if he were, say, $5.8k instead of $6.5k. But there is at least opportunity here for solid to high-end game.
SAINTS // PANTHERS THOUGHTS ::
Saints // Panthers is another game without much to like.
Given that the Panthers (for the first time all season!) are favorites, and given that the Saints have A) looked much better at home than on the road this year, and B) looked better with Rattler than with Shough so far, the only clear pathway for this game getting away from Carolina and them falling into a hole that forces them out of their standard game plan is for this team to simply come out flat after a big win in Green Bay. Barring that outcome, we should see this game playing close enough that the Panthers can lean on the run as the core staple of their offense; and if they’re leaning on the run, that means they are leaning on Rico Dowdle. Dowdle will almost certainly be popular this week at only $6.3k, but he also has games of 35.4 // 36.9 // 31.1 in his three starts. He’s locked in as the starter // workhorse back moving forward, and this is a decent matchup in a positive expected game environment. I think we can all comfortably acknowledge that there is some fragility attached to “a chalk play on the Panthers,” but Dowdle is also, obviously, a sharp way (on paper) to attack the slate this week.
On the Saints’ side, the Rashid Shaheed trade could open additional opportunity/ceiling for Olave and Juwan Johnson, in particular; but I don’t see myself getting there on tighter builds this week.
GIANTS-BEARS THOUGHTS ::
Performance under pressure has been the only blemish for Jaxson Dart this season, and he is taking on a Chicago defense that is bottom five in pressure rate. Dart costs only $5.7k and has scored 18.6+ in every start this season. He has a rushing score in all but one start, which I have been holding against him in my own assessment of where he fits on a given slate (“he can’t possibly keep this up”), but at some point, we have to just acknowledge that what a player is doing is what a player is doing.
Who to play with Dart is a bigger question mark. With Slayton back in the mix, Wan’Dale Robinson saw 11 targets, but he was also back in his old “nothing downfield” role â finishing the day against the 49ers with nine catches for 46 yards (LOL). The targets will be there, but something will have to break his way for ceiling. On the flip side, Slayton went 5-62-0, and continues to see bankable usage on the outside when he plays; but this team doesn’t take enough shots for Slayton to have any sort of floor, making him an “all ceiling, no floor” type of play. A case could be made for either of these guys with Dart. A case could also be made for playing Dart naked, or for playing him with Theo Johnson and hoping that all of the incredible touchdown luck continues (Dart rushing for touchdowns and throwing to Theo Johnson for scores). There are better on-paper plays than all these pass catchers, but there is also a world in which a Dart stack actually ends up being the best way to have played the slate, especially in this spot.
“This spot” includes Ben Johnson’s Bears taking on yet another attackable defense.
If Swift plays in this spot, the backfield may be hands-off; but if Swift misses, Monangai is once again a strong option in a matchup that, in many ways, is just as good as the matchup he had last week (with the main edge in the Bengals matchup being the higher “team scoring” ceiling that comes in those games).
Through the air, it seems highly probable that we see a hard correction back toward Odunze here. Odunze entered last week with target counts on the season of 9 // 11 // 7 // 8 // 5 // 6 // 10, and proceeded to see only three looks in a game that produced 89 combined points, posting a zero on zero catches. (Wow!) The heel issue for Odunze may be a bigger deal than the team is letting on, and of course, we have a Bears team that has lowered their passing volume since the bye; but with his price dropping and sentiment on him surely dropping as well, we should be keeping him in mind.
Caleb has an extremely high ceiling here, but he also has a lower floor than most will probably give him credit for. In his last seven games, Caleb has games of 29.1 and 38.7, but he also has under 20 points in his other five, including games of 5.7, 12.8, and 12.8. Given how high his ceiling is, he can’t simply be placed in the “higher-risk, so only play him in large-field” bucket, but we do have to balance his chances of going for a ceiling outcome with the downside he brings to the table as well.
I expect the field to overreact to Loveland’s box score from last week (17.0 DK points before his magical game-winning catch; 32.8 when all said and done), but if Kmet misses with his concussion this week, Loveland is definitely in the mix. Honestly, you can’t go wrong throwing darts at this offense. The question is just whether or not your darts land on the spots where production will come.
JOSH ALLEN-JAMES COOK UPSIDE VS. DOLPHINS ::
We’ve been on this matchup for Josh Allen since 2018, when we had him at no ownership in the first legitimate slate-breaker of his career (41.5 DK points in the final game of the season vs Miami). Through changing coaches, personnel, etc., Allen has always owned the Dolphins â though his production in Miami (84 degrees forecast for Sunday, with 74% humidity) has paled in comparison to what he has done to the Dolphins at home. He’s on the radar for me, but I don’t think I’ll actually end up getting there on tighter builds.
The same might actually go for James Cook as well, who has been outrageously good this year, but who also has only two targets across his last four games. To me, this looks like a team setting a tendency that they plan to break later (i.e., lull opponents into thinking Cook is no longer part of their schemed passing attack, then have a game in which Cook is heavily involved through the air in creative ways). We know Cook entered the league as a “pass-catching back with question marks on the ground,” and he has been a productive pass-catcher throughout his career. That said: if the Bills didn’t break that tendency against the Chiefs, it doesn’t seem likely that this is the spot where they’ll throw a changeup out there. We might be waiting until Bills // Patriots in Week 15 for this tendency to change (or Bills // Eagles in Week 17, or even the playoffs). This leaves Cook as a likely yardage-and-touchdown back priced at $7.5k, giving us more difficult paths to the upside. As good as Cook has been this year, he has cracked 25.5 DK points only two times (and that’s with a bigger pass-catching role through the early part of the season). Furthermore, Miami has fixed a lot of their early-season run defense issues of late. After Cook ripped through Carolina and Kansas City, this doesn’t concern us; but we also can’t look at this game as an obvious matchup bump. I see Cook as a player with a few more paths to the downside than the average $7.5k back, and with a few fewer paths to the upside as well. He can absolutely hit, but the confidence isn’t there the way it sometimes is with a talented back in this price range.
Put it all together, and it won’t surprise me if I don’t have heavy exposure to the Bills this week.
DOLPHINS ANGLES ::
On the other side of this game, we basically have Achane, Waddle, and no one else.
We touched on this earlier in the week, but Achane has a high floor (16+ DK points in all but one game this year â and that “one game” was against the Browns) and a high ceiling, but his chances of reaching that ceiling are dented by the offense he’s in. He has only two games all season north of 20.1 DK points. That said: this is a spot where he could post another such game.
Waddle is the play from this offense that stands out the most. If we take out a game in bad weather against the Browns’ defense, Waddle has posted DK scores (lowest to highest) of 14.2 // 15.8 // 20.9 // 26.0 since Tyreek Hill went down, with 95+ yards in three of those four games (and with the 100-yard bonus in only one of those; i.e., he’s a few yards away from an extra three points in a couple of those games). The Bills now have Maxwell Hairston, which could prove to be a game-changer here; but so far on the season, the Bills have been one of the most generous defenses in the NFL to WR1s, and Waddle’s role is as bankable as they come.
KENNETH WALKER III THOUGHTS ::
Through this angle of potentially saving some salary at running back, I keep eyeing Kenneth Walker. We know that the Seahawks are going to continue splitting things, but in a game where the Seahawks should, at worst, be playing things close throughout, and where they could easily be in control throughout, Walker should be in line for a healthy workload. Walker has games of 20 and 17 touches in games Charbs has played, and is reliably seeing 11-14 touches in most games. It’s somewhat thin, but there is an angle here to at least consider. After Walker saw snaps inside the 5-yard-line for the first time in over a month, we could have a signal that the Seahawks are going to start tilting things a bit more in his favor. (At the least, a guy can hope.)
CARDINALS ANGLES ::
Going through all these games. I’m not sure I want anything on Arizona outside of potential interest in McBride. And given how well Arizona has been playing on defense, I’m not sure I’ll end up chasing Seattle outside of maybe taking a swing or two on Walker. Because of their record, the field continues to underrate Arizona, but this is a really good team that just hasn’t been able to close out games, and this defense has made life difficult on really good offenses.
RAMS // 49ERS THOUGHTS ::
Rams // 49ers is interesting, as the Rams’ defense is not one we typically want to attack, but with the Rams looking so great on offense and the 49ers crumbling on defense under the weight of their injuries, we can forecast a good game from Los AngelesâŚand given the coaches involved in this game, we should expect this one to play close. Last time these teams met, the 49ers weren’t given a chance with injuries across the board on offense as well as on defense, and they proceeded to win 26-23 in LA. Realistically, anything can happen in this spot.
On paper, Puka is the crown jewel, while Kyren is the player who “probably won’t hit, but can,” and Davante is the player who is overpriced for his typical targets, but who has such a monster red zone // end zone role that he can still go for an elite output. There is also a theory out there that the Rams are trying to send a message to AP/MVP voters that Stafford is a guy who has always been overlooked for how good he is, and that they are giving him more scoring opportunities than normal. Whether because of this or simply because of the addition of Davante to this offense, this team ranks fifth in red zone PROE, and when you watch their games, the repeated use of “Stafford to Davante” plays in the red zone stand out in a big way. I won’t branch outside these four (Puka // Davante // Kyren // Stafford), but all four are in the mix here.
On the 49ers’ side, I see CMC as overpriced for his expected ceiling, and I see the passing attack as more of a place to throw darts than a place to attack with confidence. But again: it’s Shanahan and McVay. Things can get wacky.
DISCORD
6,223 OWS Fam Inside
LIONS THOUGHTS ::
Do the Lions want to send a message in this one? Because they have done a poor job running the ball this year, and they have continued to be one of the best passing attacks in the NFL â especially when not pressured. The Commanders are in the bottom-third of the league in pressuring the quarterback, and they have been miserable in coverage. Could this be a week in which the Lions decide to just let it rip through the air and pile up points off a loss to the Vikings? Gibbs is viable here, but Goff // ARSB // Jamo // LaPorta look like the pieces to pay attention to.
On a per-target basis, ARSB might be the most attractive wide receiver option on this entire slate, with the only question being how many targets he sees here.
Jamo comes with a low floor and no guarantee of targets, but the matchup lines up really nicely with what he does.
The Commanders have been torched by tight ends, and have been torched off play-action. LaPorta is a tight end who thrives in the play-action passing game.
All three look like highly viable one-offs this week, and I’ll definitely be tempted to tie all this together with Goff doubles and possibly even triples.
EARLY BINK MACHINE RUN RESULTS ::
Early runs in the Bink Machine are not pretty. Tetairoa McMillan is the third highest-owned player in my initial runs (wellâŚKyle Monangai was being projected for elite production, so he was up there at the top originally; but Swift said after practice today that he’ll play this week, so I removed Monangai from the pool and ran another couple sets), and Marvin Harrison Jr. is fourth.
TMac’s best game of the year was 19 DK points, all the way back in Week 2. Bryce Young has cracked 200 passing yards only once all season.
Marvin Harrison Jr. has only two games over six targets, and he is playing the Seattle defense this week.
To be clear: projections are smart, and the Bink Machine is smart. This should be taken as a signal of the kind of week it is.
I mentioned yesterday that I’m not too worried, just yet, about hunting down value. With that approach, I hadn’t built any practice builds until tonight, and had instead focused on getting a head start on thinking through games // players independent of what rosters might look like this week. After building a couple practice builds tonight, however (with Kenneth Walker and Rico Dowdle at running back, no less), I was thinking, “Man, things are a bit tight this week.”
That led to me heading over to the Bink Machine for the first time to see what it would spit out.
It should be a fun, interesting week.
Maybe it’s just optimism (after all, I always think we have edge), but I think we have edge on weeks like this. When things get tricky, the field often takes a simple approach to solving that trickiness â and that simple approach often means leaning into projections-driven chalk that isn’t as good as chalk on other weeks might be.
There’s still a long way to go in this week, but A) it looks like this will be a tricky one, and B) I’m sure we’ll figure out the ways in which we can turn this to our advantage.
In case you’re curious ::
Josh Allen showed up as the highest-exposure QB in these initial sets, followed by Jaxson Dart and Caleb Williams. I probably won’t be on Allen this week due to the way the Bills call their games, and the way I expect that game to play out; but that’s one I won’t argue against. Dart and Caleb are on my early short list of QBs as well (yesterday, that list was Dart // Caleb // Lamar // Maye // Stafford // Goff; Maye might move off my list due to the difficulty in figuring out who to stack him with, though I’m still playing around with that one; the other spots haven’t changed), but after these three, three of the next four are Davis Mills, J.J. McCarthy, and Jacoby Brissett. SoâŚyeah. It’s that kind of week.
I’m not surprised by what I’m getting at running back :: (in order of exposure, from highest to lowest) Dowdle // Achane // Cook // CMC // Gibbs. Every other running back on the slate came in at 6% or lower on this initial set. Basically: “roster Dowdle, and pay up for usage/floor certainty on another guy, hoping the ceiling comes.” That’s highly likely to be the field’s approach this week, and I think it has merit. I also, however, can see a world in which none of Achane // Cook // CMC // Gibbs go for more than 3x their salary. Basically: there could, ultimately, end up being better ways to build â though if there aren’t, that’s the approach that makes sense.
With salary allocated at running back and no clear value yet, WR exposures look like this :: TMac // MHJ // Wan’Dale // Odunze // Waddle // Flowers. For some reason, Justin Jefferson is popping next, followed â finally â by Egbuka // ARSB // Puka. JSN showed up on only 3% of rosters, but I would assume that’s nothing more than early-week projection silliness. More instructive is the salary allocation, where the top wideouts are buried down my exposure chart, because there aren’t any strong, cheap running backs to put onto rosters. But again: what if the high-priced running backs all score in the teens and 20sâŚand what if one or two of the wideouts at $7k and above go for 30+?
Tight end is for saving salary while targeting upside, with LaPorta // Hunter Henry // Kittle leading the way before we get to McBride. Kincaid, Hockenson, Juwan, and Theo Johnson come next, illustrating how quickly the position thins out.
THURSDAY, NOV. 6 ::
$1 DFS PASS đ¨
Week 10 Only*
